Talk:Wheelchair trainer

References

The references in this article need to be completed. I have done two of them as I needed them for another article too.

With so many references, I think you will find the article text easier to edit if you use named references and move the citations themselves to the references section. See Help:Footnotes#List-defined_references and, for an example, Disability in the arts. Mirokado (talk) 01:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Is it really necessary for statements to have up to six references? One is usually adequate. Only for contentious claims would two or maybe three be justified - but five or six is way over the top! Roger (talk) 12:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

If the references each illustrate something different it would be a shame to lose them. In that case it would be better to add a sentence or two for each to the article so they can be separate inline references. Christopher, you will know which are duplicates and which would support new content for the article. It would be better if you can sort this out rather than leaving it to someone else. It will be easier to write flowing text once the refs are separated as I have already suggested. — Mirokado (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

I have now moved the ref definitions into the reflist myself, as I have written a "little script" to do that. It should now be easier to see the flow of the article text while improving it. Next steps are:

• Add interesting text to the article for each reference
• Decide if any refs are in fact redundant and remove them
• Complete the references as with two already done
• Perhaps change the name= parameter for each ref to something more meaningful (easier once the refs have been completed) — Mirokado (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Wheelchair trainer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110727113742/http://rectech.ncpad.org/publications/Shivayogi_IEEE.pdf to http://rectech.ncpad.org/publications/Shivayogi_IEEE.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110727213206/http://web.resna.org/library/conference_2010/PDF%20Versions/Mobility/Student%20Scientific/Part%201/HiremathS.pdf to http://web.resna.org/library/conference_2010/PDF%20Versions/Mobility/Student%20Scientific/Part%201/HiremathS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)