Talk:Type 056 corvette

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Merge

Type 056 Light Corvette should be merged into this article. D2306 (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

agree Daveduv (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ship list

Given the strong hint by the admin over the edit war developing, I put this discussion here for greater accessibility.

As of late, I have been reverted certain edits to the ship list. These edits to the ship list have a gross lack of supporting reliable sources (WP:RS), and make these claims difficult (if not impossible) to verify (WP:VERIFY). For these reasons, I have reverted those edits in favour of the list which is generously supported by reliable sources. This latter list provides a superior basis for future additions - with supporting sources, naturally.

For anybody interested, the China Military Online articles referenced in the list were used because those articles were republished on the PRC MoD website. There may be other articles like that on the PRC MoD website that could help fill in the gaps.

Also for the record, I made my concerns known to both User:AlvinGr on 27 July 2015 and again on 1 Aug 2015, and anon IP 84.30.32.14 on 2 Aug 2015, who have been reverting the list to the unsupported version, and received no reply. I invite them to produce their sources here for evaluation. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 5 August 2015

It has been noticed by military observers that follow the developments of the Chinese Navy, that someone is deliberately editing incorrect information on the 056 Corvette. This also applies to the 054A page. Going by official Western and Chinese sources there are currently 22 active vessels in the Chinese fleet (a correct table of this information exists prior to the wiki hacker reverting the table back to 14 active vessels). Please could you restore the original build table.

As wiki represents the main reference point for internet info, its important that internet users worldwide have the best upto information, and are not subject to a single persons personal abuse of the system.

Thankyou

86.167.165.187 (talk) 19:17, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I pointed out in the previous talk section above, the previous version of the ship table failed to satisfy WP:VERIFY. The data was not supported by reliable sources, which was not helped by editors who felt no compunction to WP:PROVEIT. Reversion to the prior version would be inappropriate.
If you claim that there are "official Western and Chinese sources" (by which I mean reliable sources as per WP:RELIABLE) that support the old data (numbers, names, dates, and all) then I can only wonder why you have not added them. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Redrose64 (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


propulsion??

Any info about the propulsion? I would say it is 99% 1 or 2 Diesel Generators. I guess a stronger one for propulsion and a weaker one for board and crew-electric (watching TV via Internet/Satelitte and so on), okay I dont know if a chinese crew gets this luxus^^ But board electric is needed anyway for the important systems of all kinds. Fuel amount would be interesting too.... Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Type 056 corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Type 056 corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]