Talk:Stroma of cornea
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stroma of cornea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Stroma of cornea.
|
Often Ignored?
"This is often ignored by corneal transplant surgeons, leading to poor corneal mechanical strength in corneal transplant patients." I do not understand this remark. It seems very important so it might be a good idea to expand on this remark.Ruerd 12:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
This unsourced, unsupported statement cannot be allowed as-is, yet seems sufficiently important to merit a second look. I cannot find any support for it so I am asking the community: Can anyone find support for this assertion? If not, I will remove the "often ignored by" part--or the entire statement--later today or tomorrow. Thanks! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 12:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Unsourced statement removed, as promised. If anyone can provide authoritative, verifiable information, please do so! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 13:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)