Talk:Static wick

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Purpose

I think it provides low resistance discharge path as the static discharges are supposed to facilate the release of accumlated charges on the aircraft body.

--Msk hindawi 19:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why Redirect?

There is a redirect from "Lightning Discharge Wick" to this page. But this page specifically states that the Static Discharge Wick is not a lightning discharger.

So why the redirect?

Nick Beeson (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Static wick

Purpose

Why Redirect?

Navigation menu

Search