Talk:Simon Fraser University

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nicknames and the real dirt

The whole article at this point sounds like a promotional sheet or gladrag from the university's administration/marketing department. The political turmoil of the 1960s is passed over in a few short lines without saying what went on - even though the university's 40th anniversary used the slogan "radical by design" for a rendezvous that had all the wild panache of a church social (and not a single sandal-clad furry radical in sight). Surely there's someone out there "who was there"; cites would have to come from the Peak and newspaper reports of the day, and I wouldn't know where to start.

Nicknames that should appear in the article somewhere - "Snafu' and "Sfoo". Students up there these days are so straight-laced they probably don't dare use them, however.Skookum1 18:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it does sound like a promotional sheet at times. I'm too lazy to search, but I suspect it may be. Should a NPOV tag be slapped on it? Jjjsixsix 03:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The university press relations office, whatever it's called now, probably has someone whose duties include monitoring and editing it IMO. If so, and you're reading this, why don't you identify yourself for us?Skookum1 18:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.

This article is an absolute promotional concoction that does not belong in Wikipedia. What for example does the MBA-program have to do with the student activism in the 1960s? President Stevenson himself, in his latest Fall convocation speech rejected the political meaning of "radical" and according to him "radical campus" refers to the searching for innovation. Something should be done to improve the informative quality of this article. What's an NPOV tag? --Tmstapf
Hi Tmstapf. I agree that this page needs more attention but I don't understand your question: "What for example does the MBA-program have to do with the student activism in the 1960s?" The first Executive MBA program and student activism are both factual and verifiable historic aspects of SFU. I see on your user page that you attend SFU, so if you think "something should be done", don't sit back and wait for someone else — how about tagging claims you think are NPOV, or without citation, or in violation of any other policies and guidelines? P.S. - it's a good idea to sign your contributions on talk pages others can properly respond. Cheers to making a better article! --Ds13 23:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How can you not undertsand Tmstapf's comment about radicalism and MBAism being incompatible? By definition someone studying an MBA is counter-radical and a tool/patsy of the establishment; unless you're using "radical" in the newspeak sense that Pres. Stephenson has retooled it to, it's pretty obvious what that means. I was at SFU when the MBA program was brought in, or shortly after anyway, and all those shirt-and-tie crowd (w. jacket) were contemptuous of the "radical" atmosphere that then still was much in evidence; hippie-ism, countercultural attitudes and interdisciplinary fun, a pub that actually made a profit and people actually hung out in, and ideas that weren't locked into ideological doctrinaire by-rote twaddle (as in Arts everywhere now) or corporate rationalizations for things like an MBA program. An MBA program, like so much else up there right now, is not an intellectual pursuit, but a professional one, and should have been put into a polytechnic rather than what was supposed to be an institution for higher learning. Although these days, "higher learning" has been re-defined by types like Stephenson in the same way that "radical" has. I heard some of the "jazz" that they enlisted for various events up there this last year; not a hippie acid-rock band in sight, and the jazz was tepid; reminded me of the Social Credit passion for Dixieland played by white guys in boaters....Skookum1 18:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Simon Fraser University" as "Fraser University" in the early days?

There have been some rumours saying that SFU was originally called "Fraser University" during its first years, but had to change the name into what it is today because its abbreviation was too...interesting. Does anyone know more about it, or is it just a rumour?

Just a rumour; never heard of it. As if the Socreds would deliberately name something for an unflattering acronym; flattering acronyms, yes, unflattering ones, no. Rumours about the genesis of SFU seem to abound lately; there was a Peak article last summer by some sophomore, no doubt on a material history project, trying to "deconstruct" the "myths" about the Quad; too many weirdnesses to begin describing were in there, but among them was the notion that the pond, trees and "mountain" in the quad were supposed to represent CANADA's lakes, forests and mountains; that's a new one on me; the tour guides in the '70s and '80s always had the story "right" - the symbology of that myth is British Columbia's lakes, forests and mountains. Not that this was in Erickson's plans, or even the landscaping company's; it was all by happenstance that the design came together; it was a reporter or one of those receiving honorary degrees who coined the thing about the geographic symbolism of the Quad; but the symbology was British Columbian, not Canadian. I've noticed in recent years that there's been a fuzzification of many historical details in BC to accommodate the limited worldview (ahem) of those moving here to make our history more palatable/understandable to them; I guess this is why Toronto needs to use Vancouver's old nickname (Big Smoke) but I draw the line when revision of local mythography takes place; like Storyeum's episode on "Hudson's Bay trading ships". Ok, OK, there was the Otter and the Beaver, but it's not as if they heyday of the maritime fur trade had ANYTHING to do with the HBC, or anything else Canadian for that matter.....Skookum1 09:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Still a "strongly left wing" campus?

From the Reputation section of the article: SFU has retained a reputation for being an overall strongly left wing campus. Is this just wishful nostalgia or does SFU deserve a strong left wing label today? Obviously, this is perceptual and opinion-based. Perhaps evidence for or against this claim would consist of left-right opinion polls of student and faculty. Me, I see a university that emphasizes partnerships with the private sector, and more satellite campuses emphasizing business, entrepreneurship, and enterprise. Nothing wrong with that, and it still leaves plenty of room for a left wing population. I may just not be noticing it. Thoughts? --Ds13 19:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I was still a student there couple years ago it did seem like student activist groups and those involved with the student society are strong left wing types. However, the general student population don't really seem to care either way. attitude. Achou79 07:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I've changed this. One can no longer say it currentlly is "strongly left wing" compared to other universities.
The student socitey usually is left-wing, but most students societies in Canada are. The perception also depends on the schools/departments. If a study were done, political science might have a left-wing reputation, but I doubt engineering would.
You also have to consider the stance of the administration. The administration just approved a private, for-profit college on the campus of the school aimed at recruiting and retaining international students (who likely will then transfer to SFU) by a company called IBT Education. It is very controversial, but it is has been approved by the adminstration and passed by the university senate, and is coming to SFU. It will be the first such deal with a public university in Canadian history. This private-public parternship is not left-wing (quite the contrary, actually).
Doing a poll of political views of students at the university, you would also likely find them to be the same as the views at other post-secondary campuses in Vancouver, and the same as many universites across Canada.
Mainly, the view that the university is "strongly left wing" comes from older people that have a stereotype for the university.
One note, I don't think "radical by design" is intended to be any kind of political statement.

Drdestiny77 06:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article nominated for WikiProject Vancouver Collaboration of the Month

The article being discussed here is a nominee for Vancouver collaboration of the month. If you wish to add your vote on it, please go to WP:VCOTM. --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 02:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Demographic composition statement

SFU's ethnic composition is quite unique because of the demographic composition of Burnaby and surrounding areas and because international students make up 7% of its student body.

Just not so; the int'l student item is correct, but Burnaby's demographic's don't have anything to do with SFU's. The high number of parachuted erstwhile "resident" students who are actually int'l students (but not in name or status) is blatantly obvious to anyone who spends much time on the hill; but that's the result not of Burnaby's ethnic composition but because of the way educational marketing has gone, and also because many "resident" status students are holding passports-of-convenience and are not otherwise "Canadian", except as defined within the loosey-goosey parameters of multicultural=Canadian. There were days at SFU in a recent couple of semesters spent there when I rarely heard English except in class, or with people I knew.

To me, the quote above is a product of the poor logic and poor evidentiary standards/concepts which are now "taught" at SFU and other schools. "Pursuit of excellence", a neocorporate buzzphrase which has cut the soul out of what used to be academia, has little to do with intellectual or linguistic skills, but with higher grades (and higher fees)Skookum1 18:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Downtown facilities/campi

There's a section on SFU Surrey; there should be sections on the new business and arts schools downtown, plus that Harbour Centre ex-dept store place that's filled with corporate-promo logos on the seminar rooms (amazing what a few dozen grand can buy a corporation in the way of advertising/namespace, when they don't actually contribute much else to education other than buying the nameplate for a seminar room, huh?.Skookum1 18:21, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aquilini

The following was deleted from the SFU article recently: 

Francesco Aquilini, head of the Aquilini Investment Group based in Vancouver,
obtained a Business Administration degree from SFU. On November 17, 2004,
Aquilini signed a deal with John McCaw, previous owner of the Vancouver Canucks
and became a 50% owner of the team and the sports arena GM Place.

The reason was, "Who's this? Not important enough to get his own paragraph." [1]

I personally think that the paragraph should stay but I want to avoid the possibility of an edit war so I'm going to see what everyone else thinks first. Do you guys think this paragraph should remain or should it stay deleted? --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 04:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of "famous alumni" is subjective and just seems so prone to endless POV and vanity problems. Regarding this Aquilini person, I guess I'd say "big deal, a business major graduated and did well in business"... This would be relatively expected, I hope. Is this person "famous"? I don't think so. Notable in a page about SFU? Probably not. Mentioning the date and details of one business deal seems suspect, for sure. Wikipedia has a guideline for the notability of people, which may be relevant (certainly to Aquilini's own article). --Ds13 05:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aquilini is a pretty big name in Vancouver. His family are Italian immigrants that made a pretty big name for themselves. I think it should be left in. It also makes for a more interesting Wiki page!

Images

WAC Bennett Library

The image captioned as "Convocation Mall" really isn't, since the mall is beyond the stairs and beyond another courtyard with a different name, and can't even be seen in the picture. I would remove it, but I have another image in mind that I uploaded to commons and I don't want to be seen as "sneaking" my photo in for some kind of ego boost thing. The image of the library at right is what I have in mind. — Saxifrage ✎ 11:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded that image, and I apologize for naming it wrong since, frankly, I don't go to SFU. (Well, seems like I was refering to the roof back then, argh) But I'd think removing it is too harsh when you can just change the caption....and please don't hesitate to put your own image in the article. :) deadkid_dk 13:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's an interesting picture, yes. I can't think of a caption about a specific place to use ("The stairs between the Rotunda and the...") but maybe something about it being an example of Arthur Erikson's architectural style?
(I'd normally be fine about adding my picture if I hadn't also been intending to remove that one at the same time. I knew that if I was pulling one picture to put in my own that I'd be risking bad feelings and the appearance of self-promotion. So, I decided to take the long way of doing it.) — Saxifrage ✎ 20:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, please make the necessary changes. deadkid_dk 01:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Research" section sounds like a press release

The entire research section, talking about the awards won and the move toward 'excellence' does not seem very NPOV -- it sounds like something put out by the PR office of the university. In particular the line "Long known as an innovative teaching university, SFU has moved toward research excellence" should be either made quantitative or dropped. (How many papers are published by SFU faculty per year as compared to other schools in Canada, and compared to other schools in the world?) Also it would be nice to see a list of famous faculty members (e.g. the Borwein brothers, the woman in Criminology who was on the cover of Time....) Spebudmak 18:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Excellence", "world-class", "innovative" and all the rest of that language are part of the Fraser Institute/BC Liberal newspeak that dominates public media in BC. All vomit-generating spew, but they sure like to use it ad nauseam; like the claim that the Bog is a "world-class training facility" when it doesn't even have dumbbells that aren't bent, only a few machines, and a bossy training coach who's into keeping everyone not under his immediate thumb out of the room; all at student rec fees expense, of course; the equipment's old, the door locks at 8, and there's not enough weights (and what few there are often don't match). But in their writeups and press releases, it's "world-class". In attitude, certainly....Skookum1 18:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty lame write up section but the article may get too long if we add in write ups of individual departments. Any suggestions on how to proceed? Stealth cat 23:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SFU Surrey image

I've updated the caption to the Central City (SFU Surrey) image, as it's (no longer) correct. It said that SFU Surrey occupied the lower, rectangular portion, when in fact they now occupy the 14th and 15th floors of the Central City tower. DoctorElmo 01:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political history

This article will not be complete without a discussion of the PoliSci-Soc-Anthro (PSA) Department and its eventual disbandment, and the associated political fracas that went on in the university's "founding years". These events were "highly notable" and documentable as well, even though they're shoved under the rug up at SFU all the time, as they have been here (as I remember they were here in earlier versions of the page). I don't date back that far myself, and it's all kind of hazy to me, but I know it's important enough that it shouldn't be omitted from this page; and important enough that once it's put back in or put in properly, it shouldn't be a candidate for deletion/censorship by the university's multi-headed watchdogs who patrol this page - which reads like a brochure, and has next to nil student content; in "careful" language, the kind of re-branding that makes the new-polytechnic flavour of modern SFU such an unpleasant experience for those use to the more collegial times when people weren't just in school to prep for a life of credit ratings and "career advancement", but actually to "get an education" (not just "get a degree") and become someone. I'll repeat my earlier comments that this page reads like a promotional brochure, and also point any SFU staffers, especially from the Public Relations Dept., to WP:COI.

Coast of Arms/Crest

I made the amendment to the Coat of Arms thing because it should be clearly stated why the daggers were removed, i.e. to satisfy orthodox Muslim students who chose to be offended by the "Crusader daggers" (that's citable, but I don't have Peak archives handy); Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and Sikhs were not offended and raised no outcry; only Muslims; even us quasi-agnostic ex/semi-Christians weren't offended by religious symbols - heraldic symbols, actually, long lost of religious assocations. I wonder - my maternal-side family crest has three large crescents on it - should I replace them with crosses or rosettes since I'm not Muslim? And the Fraser tartan - isn't that offensive to Campbells? Shouldn't it be replaced as well? Sheesh.... Skookum1 19:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid an IP address edit, from a location in Ottawa, which zeroed in on my change and pronounced it "erroneous" without providing a cite. This particular IP address - 142.58.129.100 - has only one edit in its history, but others with the same 142.58.*.* series also have only a few edits, all to do with SFU, and particularly to do with the Coat of Arms thing; "someone has an agenda" here, and to me it's an agenda of soft-soaping something that's written clear as day and should be stated as such; the "Crusader daggers" thing was in the Peak and also in mainstream media coverage of the controversy, so how can it be "erroneous"? There's soft-soap all over this page but this was one particularly glaring example; another is on how the new readin'n'writin' requirements/courses are to "improve the core capabilities of students" while in actuality it's to address the deplorable English-language skills of many students, ESL or otherwise, which is an inheritance from the degrading of writing/reading skills in public schools/curriculum; I've seen fourth-year papers get an "A" when they wouldn't have gotten barely a "C" in what should be Grade 11 levels of English, the rationale usually being that the person "did they best they could". Too long a discussion to condense into the article, but presenting the remedial reading/writing program as if if it were some kind of great post-secondary achievement is, well, kind of an over-sell, and inherently dishonest, too. Like so much at SFU, though....Skookum1 22:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually 142.58.*.* are SFU IP addresses. Expect many... 24.84.6.197 01:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked the online archive of the Peak (which seems to have a pretty good past database of articles) and couldn't find any reference to any variant of 'crusade* dagger*' so we may have to drop this for now. Not that'd I'd be opposed to putting it in there if there were a verifiable source, but Skookum1 you also obviously have a POV that you want to express through this page, so maybe we're just going to get involved in an edit war here unless it gets dropped, or you find the source. Stealth cat 23:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I know jack about it, but from having worked there for a while and dealing with the crest, those were just regular old Xian crosses, nothing more. Maybe "crusade dagger" was a bit of metaphorical rhetoric or something. What's a "crusade dagger" anyhow? Not to say that this article doesn't have PR all over it, but let's not go overboard.24.84.6.197 05:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Le Corbusier

Although he was not the architect, the original campus heavily reflects the Five Points of architecture. (Mchelada 03:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Issues with Course Availability

We should add a section about course availability problem that plague SFU. In a report compiled by SFU's Institute of Research and Planning, they outright admitted that SFU has a problem with course availability. We should include this problem in the article as it is in public domain and an important part of all articles regarding educations.

For the reports, visit... http://www.sfu.ca/irp/courses/CourseFullTurnaway/index.html

A SFU student 13:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Due to the lack of response, I have added the section. Thankyou for reading and feel free to expand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.172.27 (talk) 06:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure if this is all that notable. I'm sure every university has problems that are immensely important to its students but it's not clear whether the course registration issue has been really newsworthy. Seems a bit navel-gazing to me, but I've left it on and would like to hear more.
Oh, and I also removed the blurb about the "post-Sputnik boom" in the leader. Uncited and not used in any other university article that I know of. Kelvinc 05:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think this section should remain because SFU is the only university in BC that have this problem according to an internal SFU report.

TechOne

I updated the TechOne section to reflect the new changes, but I think I went into too much unnecessary detail, listing all the core courses and their codes. Would a more general overview of the goal of the program and the recent changes be more appropriate? I'm in TechOne, for what it's worth. Hwesta 01:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Stuque (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Yes, I think more general info would be more useful --- course specific information changes frequently, and it is better to refer to the TechOne website to get the most accurate information. Plus, going into detail about any one particular SFU program doesn't make much sense, unless there is something especially noteworthy about it. Stuque (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CoatofArms new.jpg

Image:CoatofArms new.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The coat of arms is now designated for "official use only". I'm not removing it (the coat of arms image(s)), because I think that's a load of horseshit, but that's the deal. The plain white-on-red 'SFU' is OK for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.6.197 (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange line in the sports section

In the small part about the hockey team, it says: "Currently their roster consists of 2 goalies, 7 defence, and 15 forwards." That's such a weird comment, similar to "Currently, humans breathe oxygen." Any reason for me not to change this? 70.69.13.18 (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Ridiculously unnecessary. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[SFU Vancouver] and [SFU Surrey] circular reference?

Question: both of those links are found in the [Simon Fraser University] article and redirect to itself. Does someone intend to flesh out those articles? FYI I originally found the SFU Surrey link in the Andromeda article and changed it to read "...the Surrey, BC campus of Simon Fraser University". Southsloper (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There should be subarticles for the separate campuses, including their building/site histories; apparenetly too people are busy writing up p.r. for the university instead of trying to write encyclopedically enough to care....Skookum1 (talk) 04:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a "debrochurize" template?

Skookum1 (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Random thoughts

Will anybody, please, explain what is a "comprehensive university"? Thanks on behalf of a lot of non-native English speakers. Pedron (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC) It's a category used in MacLean's (the magazine) in ranking Canadian universities. Basically it's the one that's between "universities with medical schools" and "universities with only bachelors' programs".Terukiyo (talk) 23:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An anon just added the following unsourced (and incomplete) statement, and I've moved it here for discussion:

"SFU has the largest undergraduate History department in Middle East and Islamic studies."

First it needs a source, and second it needs a qualifier since I'm pretty sure it doesn't have the largest in the universe. Does anyone know where this claim comes from?  — Saxifrage | ☎ 09:51, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The history department's ego, that's where. More brochure bumpf, like "the most beautiful setting", the "unique ethnic composition" and all that; self-flatulating aggrandizement is one of SFU officialdom's modern hallmarks.Skookum1 17:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doing massive cleanup on the article

I am doing some work to debrochurize this template. Any advice/comments would be great

Soggybread (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Soggybread[reply]

blazons of coats of arms

The blazons of each coat of arms should be given, epseically since there's a special section on them. I don't know where to look, but presumably the Cowichan Herald Extraordinary monitors his own webpage, so the talkpage there might be a good place to ask; each coat of arms has a meaning - I think, but am not sure, that the old/original one is based on Clan Fraser's....Skookum1 (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, not quite; the new one seems similar, or to contain parts of the coat of arms of Lord Lovat's, aka Simon Fraser, who is the 25th head of Clan Fraser.Skookum1 (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It seems worthwhile to quote from the source site:
SFU never in fact requested crosses on its original coat of arms. It asked the chief Scottish herald — the Lord Lyon King of Arms — for permission to use the coat of arms of the Clan Fraser's chief.
The clan chief approved, but the Lord Lyon did not. The herald chose instead to add a top field to the arms, containing a book and the two crosses, because they had been on the coat of arms of an early MacDonell clan member who had married a Fraser chief.

The Lord Lyon did not approve for a very simple reason - coats of arms are unique and cannot be held simultaneously by two bodies/people. As for the bit with the crosses, I knew lots of international students 1977-1981 and never heard anything about this; and I know from a friend who's been up there for the last few years that the change was agitated for by Muslim students who railed against "crusader daggers", apparently in letters to the editor in The Peak; in fact the clan chief of McDonell whose coat of arms it was may indeed have been a Crusader; but the Islamic crescent was likewise used to slaughter Christians throughout the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe, and it is not simillarly held in disregard as the cross has come to be. I should stress I'm speaking as a non-Christian, but tired of seeing the endless censure of Christian society/civilization and derogation of its symbols by those who are no better. I don't have a cite for the "crusader daggers' thing but my friend (who's not Christian either) wouldn't have mentioned it if it were not the case. Catering to religioius paranoia is not something, of course, that an official publication of the university would admit to, and it strikes me as a marketing decision more than anything else, to "make people feel welcome" - people with prejudices about "Christian institutions". Stanford and Notre Dame and many other universiities are religious in origin (Notre Dame still in its management) but do not discriminate against non-Christians; if non-Christians discriminate against them because they are Christian insitutions then I submit they're not people who you'd want as students. Apparently SFU does...this is not meant to "discuss" this issue, but to point to other sources so that the whole truth - not just hte sanitized official version - will be told, eventually, if not now....Skookum1 (talk) 05:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

webometrics ratings

Everyone knows that webometrics is not a rating of the university, but the university's ability to utilize the internet (good webpages, research sites, web publications, online courses, etc.). It shouldn't be so prominent on the page (first paragraph). It should be either removed or reworded to it's meaning is explicit.

http://www.webometrics.info/about_rank.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.138.6 (talk) 07:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Univercity Entrance.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Univercity Entrance.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TASC2 Building

I just restored an image File:The TASC2 Building on the Simon Fraser University Campus.jpg, after receiving permission. I don't see that it was used on this page, but if it is useful here, or elsewhere, it is back.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA

SFU will be in the NCAA, but it is not yet. See this[2]. 98.82.22.234 (talk) 15:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty section

There is a section for famous alumni, but what about famous faculty members? MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Benston came to SFU in 1966. She wrote around 1967 a most important paper for feminism at that time and still now (house wages campaign, social reproduction theory…), widely circulated at the time and ultimately published as "The Political Economy of Women’s Liberation", Monthly Review 21 (4) doi: 10.14452/MR-021-04-1969-08_2, p. 13–27. There is a special issue of Monthly Review for the 50th anniversary of that paper, doi: 10.14452/MR-071-04-2019-08_1. Of course a Faculty section needs more than one name. I give it here just in case. (I know nothing else about SFU and English is not my mother language. Therefore, sorry, I am not the one to make a Faculty section.) --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Simon Fraser University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Simon Fraser University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Simon Fraser University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Simon Fraser University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honorary alumni

I think this section should be deleted. Really. Who cares? Not important. --2604:2000:E010:1100:CD00:E9D3:53D9:FBE (talk) 07:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consistently ranked as Wikipedia's most prolific source of puff, universities love sports, and they own some of the world's largest football stadiums

Consistently ranked as Canada's top comprehensive university and named to the Times Higher Education list of 100 world universities under 50, SFU is also the first Canadian member of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the world's largest college sports association.

However ridiculous the sentence structure, the conceptual subordination of academic excellence as a dangling modifier of sports excellence is non-trivial, and should be promptly flagged for five and a game. — MaxEnt 15:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Simon_Fraser_University"