Talk:Silver oxide

Name

Since there are two stable oxides of silver, shouldn't this article be called Silver(I) oxide? Walkerma (talk) 01:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Hydroxide

Right now, Silver hydroxide redirects here, even though it's an entirely different compound... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.179.62.165 (talk) 13:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current article discusses AgOH, so it makes sense to redirect here. The information on AgOH (AuOH, Ti(OH)4 etc) is so flimsy that these materials are often described in the context of the better characterized reference materials to which the hydroxides decompose. One of these days someone will write an article on AgOH. Just started is an article on hydrogen astatide, so editors are prowling for simple compositions where textbooks can guide them to fill out tables and extrapolate properties.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pattent Number

The preparation section states "US patent 20,050,050,990 describes the preparation of AgO with properties suitable for use as a fine grained conductive paste filler." (I added the commas to the number.) Since there are only around 9 or 10 million patents, this would aear to be in error. Joe Avins (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is that meltingpoint under argon?

cause Phase relations say melting point is higher. it probably reacts Wikistallion (talk) 07:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silver oxide → Silver(I) oxide – Although silver is predominantly monovalent, there is also a silver(I,III) oxide that is important. That's the same reason Silver(I) fluoride is disambiguated from Silver(II) fluoride and two other silver fluorides. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So is the proposal then to create a {{Chemistry index}} at the base name? Mdewman6 (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for lack of support mostly. I think this is a good and common name for the common oxide of silver, while the proposed more technical name is perhaps overly precise. Dicklyon (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The current title is the common name. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"20664-12-3" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 20664-12-3 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § 20664-12-3 until a consensus is reached. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]