Talk:Serology
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What about the alternative (UK/Australian) spelling? i.e., seriology, seriological, etc. Just for those non-Americans out there who search on that spelling and get nowhere. Belmop (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC) diagnostic identification to detect antobodies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.178.255 (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Book
here is some of the Immunology books, hope it could help those who in college.
--36.225.96.5 (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ IMMUNOLOGY & SEROLOGY IN LABORATORY MEDICINE ( TURGEON). Mosby; 5 edition (March 1, 2013). ISBN 978-0323085182.
- ^ Pearson Clinical Laboratory Science. Prentice Hall; 1 edition (July 19, 2012). ISBN 0135104246.
- ^ Immunology & Serology in Laboratory Medicine ( Turgeon). Mosby; 4 edition (September 25, 2008). ISBN 0323043828.
"Serum concentrations" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Serum concentrations. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
“Protein” is Not Listed in Other Dictionaries
The specific word ‘protein’ does not appear in other dictionaries and should be omitted from the definition. It is a biased word link only to protein gene form of what has been deemed an immunity booster and should not be considered an actual immunization. The constant need for booster shots proves the body does not identify the mRNA as a vaccination. mRNA has failed in many laboratory settings and I believe was pushed into the medicine out of fear. The protein should be edited out. 2600:8801:A91A:6800:6452:7A71:A9AF:B669 (talk) 09:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)