Talk:Septic embolism
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reason for {{hangon}} template
I know I didn't create the page, but it is a valid article; sure, a bit lacking, but see Embolism. According to that article this is a genuine condition. I think it could be expanded upon. Master of Puppets Care to share? 06:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, seems a candidate for expansion but definitely should not be deleted - it gives the main point of the condition, unlike something like "James Bob is the best player ever!!!!!!!!!!!111" which is usually a target for db-nocontext. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 06:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Extrapulmonary?
I don't get that, does it mean outside the lungs? If so what does that have to do with IV drug use?
Should it be extracirculatory instead?
cyclosarin (talk) 06:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm thinking now that it really does mean pulmonary but if so the IV drug use is out of context and the article needs more explanation of how the lungs are involved. cyclosarin (talk) 06:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)