Talk:Sacral dimple
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.PNG)
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Not sure about that last paragraph
But please leave it anyway, until the article is fleshed out a bit more -- a little levity now and then is a good thing.drh (talk) 12:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
This is mostly incorrect
As a researcher involved with sacral dimples and other cutaneous lesions, this article is in need of some help. I'll be able to start fixing it in the near future (within a month). This page is probably not too popular anyway. Link465 (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
"Dimples of Venus"
"There is another use for the term "Dimples of Venus" in surgical anatomy. These are two symmetrical indentations on the posterior aspect of the sacrum which also contain a venous channel. They are used as a landmark for finding the superior articular facets of the sacrum as a guide to place sacral pedicle screws in spine surgery.[1]"--from Dimples of Venus. Are these something different from the sacral dimples?
- ^ Youmans Neurological Surgery; 5th ed., 2004
--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Inappropriate picture
It is possible to image this malformation without indecent exposure. 37.248.171.42 (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I agree, at least crop it. 2605:59C8:71:E110:FD95:7C92:CCF7:8C3B (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Picture removed. Calling for someone to contribute a picture that we can use in this article that is more appropriate. MedGME (talk) 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)