Talk:SH2 domain

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links mislabeled

The links in the section "Available PDB structures" don't go to any of the PDB sites, but to PDBsum. I suggest renaming the section to "Links to PDBsum" and adding another section that redirects to the PDB, similar to what is available for many other protein related pages, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHC1 (one of the proteins that has a SH2 like domain). --Andorsch (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PDBsum is probably the best single page summary of PDB structure entries available. So I think that it is a good link to use in Wikipedia. But it is probably best that these links are all consistent within Wikipedia. So I would suggest changing the links to the RCSB PDB website. Alexbateman (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there are 122 human proteins containing SH2 - not 111 as article says

I think there are 122 known human proteins containing SH2 - not 111 as article says There are however 111 for which experimental interaction data is available. This is a link to the article i'm basing my idea on: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ng.3138.html (that's all I know about the topic)

if that's the case then 111 needs to be changed to 122 and the citation needs to be changed.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SH2 domain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090707043920/http://genetics.uchc.edu:80/faculty/mayer_linkpage.htm to http://genetics.uchc.edu/faculty/mayer_linkpage.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions

I just combined three sections of the old article into a single "Structure and interactions" section and added a few new references. The previous version did not cite many sources, was worded confusingly, and contained many redundant passages. I think the article is cleaner now but it could still use a simple summary in the lede...as it stands now only a biochemist could understand the article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]