A fact from Resulting trusts in English law appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Isn't this article completely back-to-front? The presumption of advancement was an exception to the presumption of resulting trust, not the other way round. In any event the presumption of advancement was abolished by section 199 Equality Act 2010 (not certain that this is yet in force)? Cyclopaedic (talk) 15:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I don't know; I wrote it a while back and got rid of most of my legal texts in 2013 or so :(. Ironholds (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if you know enough to have an opinion, any chance you have sources to hand? That way we could just correct it using those. Ironholds (talk) 22:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
