Talk:Responsive neurostimulation device

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Copyright status? Hangon

I tagged this for speedy deletion as a copyright violation previously (Feb 2008), and User:Philippe removed the speedy tag indicating that permission was received (see article history). However, no OTRS notice has been placed on this article talk page, so its unclear whether permission was received and the notice is here is simply missing, or whether the copyvio tag was mistakenly removed. -- Whpq (talk) 13:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FDA panel approval

Looks like this device has been approved by the FDA's Neurological Devices panel. Maralia (talk) 20:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite needed?

This article reads almost like a product brochure/leaflet, and it might be in need for a rewrite, anyone agree? Swedra (talk) 17:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted clean up to remove advertising

The article was re-written as a press release in 2017, by the user 209.37.101.2 This could possibly have been the manufacturer's media rep who put her contact info at the bottom of the page. Be wary if they start editing again. I cleaned up the page before I realised this person's edits, so an alternative would be to rollback the article to before their edits, I'm not sure if anything major has been done since then. - 37.169.248.250 (talk) 10:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should this page even exist?

Is this a unique procedure or is it just a type of Deep Brain Stimulation, to be included in that page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.169.248.250 (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this procedure is distinct from deep brain stimulation for focal epilepsy. DBS does not utilize a closed loop detection system and stimulates continuously. Localization of stimulation in the brain also differs. --Lbhickman (talk) 07:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Draft

I have made a new draft of this article that is less focused on one company's product and more on the role of the technology as a treatment modality. If anyone has any feedback, let me know. -- DogMcBarkMD (talk) 04:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]