Talk:Prokaryotic cytoskeleton

Min system

What is the reason to consider the Min system a part of E. coli cytoskeleton? As fas as I understand, it is not enough to form filaments, cytoskeleton has to be able to perform some mechanical/structural functions. This was never shown for tis system, it only has regulatory role.--67.169.103.87 (talk) 10:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Is there any filamentous protein network in eukaryotic cells that is not considered to be cytoskeletal? I can't think of any off the top of my head. MinD is a dynamic, filament-forming protein with roles in cell division. The fact that it works in a way that isn't directly comparable to better-established systems should not, in my view, exclude it from the umbrella category of "cytoskeleton." I think we have to be open-minded and willing to revisit and redefine concepts like "cytoskeleton" as new things crop up. MicroProf (talk) 14:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

procaryotic

Shloud'nt be eubacterial : all of these proteins seem to be extracted from eubacteria. What about archaeal cytoskeleton ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.241.178.233 (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prokaryotic cytoskeleton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061117183040/http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk:80/SS/Lowe_J/group/PDF/annrev2006.pdf to http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/SS/Lowe_J/group/PDF/annrev2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)