Talk:Penaeus monodon

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 29 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Khix15. Peer reviewers: Lauren ku, Mkelly3856.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Pictures, please? -Iopq 00:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I direct editors to the above news article from The Guardian for possible inclusion in this Wikipedia article. --86.8.253.190 (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 02:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should article be moved?

Should this article be moved to Giant tiger prawn or Asian tiger shrimp to better comply with WP:COMMONNAME? --Bensin (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bleu's Peer Review

Good solid start to your article. Would like to see more information about the reproductive strategies if possible. Really interesting addition of information about the presence in aquaculture and Greenpeace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brivel9501 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Good lead.

Description section is good.

On distribution section,I would start your sentence with the species name again, not "its" so that if someone skips directly to that section they know exactly what the subject of the sentence is.

In the sustainable consumption section try to paraphrase what Greenpeace says instead of using direct quotes.

Might want to try and find a few journal articles for sources to strengthen your reference section.

Lauren ku (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]