Talk:Pebble (watch)/Archives/2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Pebble Time
We need more information on this new watch (tech and software specs) and the writing needs to seem less like an advertisement (I fixed most of it). JC713 (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
What is "Sharp Memory LCD"?
Regarding:
- Sharp Memory LCD
Is that a brand name or is it a particular kind of LCD? It is not clear and context is currently missing. --Mortense (talk) 20:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
References
Requested move 16 November 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No support for the proposed title. Jenks24 (talk) 08:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Pebble (watch) → Pebble Smartwatch – Per WP:NATURAL, and the product has been referred to as "Pebble Smartwatch" in the article. sst✈discuss 12:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- If moved, don't use a capital "S" in "smartwatch": I checked several of the sources cited in the article (Bloomberg, Comparesmartwatches, Wired, Readwrite, Los Angeles Times), and they all seem to use a lowercase "S" in the phrase "Pebble smartwatch" (in the body of the articles, if not also in the headline). Per WP:MOSCAPS, "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization". —BarrelProof (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. Following the most common name ("Pebble"), and disambiguating with parenthesis is the right thing to do here. The proposed title is misleading, suggesting that the most common name is "Pebble Smartwatch". --В²C ☎ 03:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- They're retroactively referring to this model as Pebble Classic now. Maybe we should go by that instead, and give Pebble the company its article? ViperSnake151 Talk 00:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. Next year the old model (which I bought for myself last month) will be very old-fashioned, perhaps even discontinued. We can wait. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.