Talk:Obstetric medicine

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 September 2018 and 21 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MatthewNadybal, RosePerera21. Peer reviewers: Knwightm, Izzysunbear, Elicordova, Alecrashidi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

Good job explaining what it means.

2) What changes would you suggest the author(s) apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author(s) could do to improve the article?

Definitely add more to the article. History, developments, etc.

Maybe explain how obstetric medicine is similar and different to maternal medicine?

3) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

Nothing applicable, but interesting article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzysunbear (talk • contribs) 20:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Eli's Peer Review

1. First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

I think you did a good job of explaining what obstetric medicine is and making the distinction that such medicine aims to treat pregnant women, and does not directly care for the fetus.

2. What changes would you suggest the author(s) apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

Assuming this is a new article, I think it's really interesting because I've never heard of the term before. You did a good job of explaining what it is but you can elaborate so much more within the context of our ethnic studies class. Some possible sections can include the history of obstetric medicine, treatment of pregnant women, etc.

3. What's the most important thing the author(s) could do to improve the article?

You're probably haven't gotten into this, but I'd certainly recommend expanding the length and beginning to think of some subsections you can incorporate.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

Not at this point.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elicordova (talk • contribs) 02:25, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Alec Rashidi's Peer Review

1. Article does a great job at explaining what the subject is. Despite being pre-med, I have yet to learn much about obstetric medicine, so this was a very interesting article to read. 2. I honestly have no suggestions for changes/improvements. It seems like you haven't been able to put in as much work as you'd like, so maybe more constructive comments could be made in the future. 3. Just adding more information/text. 4. My article is about a physician, so maybe I could go more in depth about the science of his medicine. ```` Alec Rashidi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alecrashidi (talk • contribs) 05:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)