This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Neutrality and point of view concerns
The article has a very promotional tone and appears to be written from the point of view of the subject of the article and to lack balance. For example, the phrase "...she developed her own non-governmental organization to empower indigenous Sarayaku’s youth and women and to protect the Southern Ecuadorian Amazon." is not neutral. It reads as if it was copied from a press release from the organization and that it is intended to reflect positively on Gualinga. A more neutral tone would use a third party reliable source and stick to citable facts. For example, "the organization she founded has a membership of 3,000 as of 2020,[1] and has received positive feedback from the Ecuadorian government on its contribution to youth education in the country.[2]" Similarly, the article takes a one-sided view of her contribution. What do the companies and other interests who she opposes have to say about her? E.g., "Gualinga claims that the forests are being destroyed by corporate interests, but the largest oil company operating in the region disputes this view." QuiteUnusual (talk) 15:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, "...she developed her own non-governmental organization to empower indigenous Sarayaku’s youth and women and to protect the Southern Ecuadorian Amazon." seems neutral to me if empowering and protecting was why she did it (and there are good sources backing it, which on the other hand seems to be a bit thin). That's not only a factual statement, but also gives the reader an insight to what motivates Gualinga. But I agree that the there are more to cover. Ainali (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am very confused by these tags, reading the whole article: I can't find anything that appears not from multiple perspectives/approaches. The very nature of climate and indigenous activists is that they have little additional coverage or critique: their voices are so underrepresented, that their particular opinions rarely are in dispute, but rather just neglected -- you would need evidence that there "are significant other opinions" to challenge the other positions -- it would be very different this article were clearly about something that is likely to have multiple perspective out in the world, Sadads (talk) 17:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Grandmother: Cristina Gualinga, Corina Montalvo, or both?
This edit changed grandma's name to Corina Montalvo, but the link doesn't support that Corina is in fact Nina'a grandmother. Can anyone find some other corroboration? I'm going to put it back to Cristina Gualinga for now, since sources actually exist that connect Cristina Gualinga to Nina and the rest of the Gualinga family. – Anon423 (talk) 06:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
