Talk:Lysophosphatidylcholine

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled

I took the chembox out since it showed a particulary chemical substance, while LPC are a class of substances.
Hence the R for "rest". The ChEMBL-Number was also not labeling a LPC: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=478969 (Rjhornung (talk) 21:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]


Actually, your URL above is pointing to the PUBCHEM page, rather than the ChEMBL page - https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/compound/inspect/CHEMBL478969 - Which I hope you can see is clearly an LPC. As they aren't specifically named, I thought it would be useful to show an example of an LPC with a link to our database to give them biological assay data.

I am aware that PUBCHEM is not ChEBL. It was to show that this reference was wrong.

Yes, it is one example for an LPC. Please feel free to add it as such. But as chembox I think it is not good. These article is about a class of substances. E.g.:Other LPC have a different mass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjhornung (talkcontribs) 20:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Louisajb (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lysophosphatidylcholine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]