Talk:Lithium hydride

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lithium Deuteride?

Why not mention Lithium Deuteride as a fuel for thermonuclear weapons? I was redirected here; there is no reference to LiD. It needs its own page.

- This page was censored by the powers that be, virtually all practical information about 3rd and 4th generation nuclear weapons has been redacted over the past couple of years. I can't say I blame them but they've gone a little too far. 27.32.119.135 (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many years ago, I was present at a spill of this stuff. (I can say that much -- I could probably be imprisoned for saying where or when.) You do not -- not ever! -- want this on your skin. It burns. A lot. And then, if God's not smiling on you, some cretin who didn't read the MSDS decides to wash it off with water ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.173.144 (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested split

Lithium deuteride is so notable on its own, as a nuclear fuel, that it deserves its own article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whoop whoop pull up (talk • contribs) 10:11, 23 January 2012

Most such splits are waste of time, as there is no necessity for them (this article is not overly long, and the material to be split is just a short paragraph). If you're planning to significantly expand LiD, then it is another matter, just go ahead and expand in Lithium deuteride. A minor expansion can be done in this article, and moved to LiD when necessary. Materialscientist (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Umm - Lithium deuteride redirects back to this page. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 02:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium hydride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Bravo

The very large H-bomb test called Castle Bravo in 1954 was a very important one in American history, scientific history, diplomatic history (because of the innocent Japanese and Micronesians who were irradiated and harmed, and even killed), American military history, etc. The Castle series of tests also proved the validity of the "dry" thermonuclear bomb using lithium-6 deuteride.
The pertinent nuclear reactions need to be shown in standard nuclear equations:
Li-6 + n --> He-4 + H-3, with the He-4 being an inert byproduct
The usual reaction for Li-7 is
Li-7 + n --> 2He-4 + electron,
but under extreme conditions, such as in the Castle Bravo test, other reactions can occur,
such as: Li-7 + 2n --> He-4 + H-3 + H-2 + electron, yielding tritium.
The hydrogen fusion reaction of H-3 + H-2 --> He-4 + n
happens under less extreme conditions than H-2 + H-2 --> He-4
and it yields more energy in the form of gamma rays and kinetic energy. Some expert needs to pin it down for us.
47.215.180.7 (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium hydride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colourless solid ?

What exactly is a colourless solid ? Colourless gases and liquids are transparent, is that what is meant here ? And why are commercial samples grey ? 77.6.177.25 (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Lithium_hydride"