Talk:Kink (medicine)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The
The whole reason I seperated the article was that while wikipedia isn't filtered for children many might be offended when they look for a (relatively) safe term and find a sexual article. It also might be offensive for the link to be labled as such. Chooserr
- Yeah, I gathered it was something like that. I disagree that Wikipedia should censor encyclopedic sexual content; it's an encyclopedia, and sex, including kinky sex, exists in the world. I especially disagree with disguising links to potentially offensive content - surely that won't prevent a child from clicking on it, and it's just misleading and confusing for everyone. Saying "for non-normative sexual behavior, see Kink (sexual)" is very clear, and anyone who would be offended by reading about something like that can choose not to click on the link. Labelling it unclearly is just asking for someone who doesn't want to read it to find it by accident. As for the very idea of taking questionable steps to "protect" children, please read the policy Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors. -GTBacchus 21:55, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
I've gathered that it isn't censored for minors...that's why I put it in my above message. Clearly label it if you want. It won't do me much good to change it if you're just going to change it back. Chooserr
- Look, I'm not trying to be pushy or something - I just don't see how departing from the standard form of disambiguation message is going to prevent anyone getting offended - more likely to surprise someone who clicks on a link not knowing what to expect... If you change it again, I won't revert, but someone eventually will, because there's people around here who take it upon themselves to standardize disambiguation messages, and disclaimers are not well-liked by the Wikipedia community, from what I've seen. Check out the disambiguation page Prince Albert - one of the pages it points to is a male genital piercing, with a big, top-of-the-page picture of a penis, which is at least as offensive as a kink, I guess, but there's no effort to disguise what's behind that link. Best thing is to call a genital piercing a genital piercing, and to call a non-normative sexual behavior a non-normative sexual behavior, then people who are not interested know exactly how to avoid it; at least that's the way I see it. -GTBacchus 06:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)