Talk:Kim-Joy

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Content From Subject or Partisan

Significant portions of the article speak directly to concerns intimate or of merit only to the personality subject of the article- what Kim-Joy was considering to study, the name of her cats, partner, etc. The tone, focus, and scale of elements should be edited for encyclopedic character. Mavigogun (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Kim-Joy with kittens Mochi and Inki.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reversion

Not sure why sections were removed and card game was added to a renamed 'bibliography' section. It's not a book, and it's not by her. Valereee (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... My mistake. I realize that when I just now read the article. George Ho (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

surname

apparently she avoided using her father's surname, and I'm not sure we can argue she was notable under it. I kind of feel like we don't need it in the lead? Valereee (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joint second or runner-up?

Why should she be considered "joint second" rather than "runner-up"? I'm uncertain whether she should be considered "joint second". She's always a runner-up as said in the season page. All others considered "joint second" are also "runners-up". George Ho (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho, I think it may be a BrEng thing? Valereee (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too many details?

I can't help wonder whether the article currently has too many details that would interest niche, i.e. specific, audience. I don't know how and why critics' opinions improve readers' understanding of this person. Maybe readers are unable to taste her bakes or something? George Ho (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Critic's opinions of her work are important to readers' understanding of how her work was received. Valereee (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]