Talk:Joseph Maraachli case

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why is this article here? besides propaganda?

how do we nominate this for deletion? 50.9.109.170 (talk) 03:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability NYyankees51 (talk) 04:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
and how is this dead child notable? besides pro-lifers propaganda?

50.9.109.170 (talk) 08:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that articles should only be prodded if they are clearly non-notable and their deletion is likely to be uncontested (except maybe by the creator). This article certainly does not fall into that category. Take to AfD if you feel it is not notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The general guidelines for notability are given at WP:GNG with more detail for events like this at WP:EVENT. To nominate an article for deletion you should follow the instructions at WP:AFD. I very much doubt you will manage to gain consensus for deletion, given the depth of media coverage that this case generated. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

little help here. I like to nominate this propaganda article for deletion

can someone do that please or point me to the right direction? 50.9.109.170 (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Catfish Jim's note above. --Kenatipo speak! 04:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you start the procedure, as explained at WP:AFD, I will complete the parts that IPs can't do. However, considering the sustained coverage in the news in two countries, as demonstrated by the references given, it's very unlikely that the discussion will result in a consensus to delete. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Maraachli case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]