Talk:Intuitive Surgical

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Robotics Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Stub‑class

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Looks like last section has been Hijacked by the company

The last section seems to be purely advertisement from the company, with no citation. It should be deleted.109.232.58.185 (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content copied from website

The contents is a copy from the website of the company. Just advertisement! Could one please rewrite this. Of course Intuitive Surgical is relevant. Would pure advertising context justify deletion of the article anyway? --Timekeeper77 07:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but it can justify deleting all the material that likely violates their copyright. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BMJ opinion piece

http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f7470.full
Personal View: The robotic surgery monopoly is a poor deal
BMJ 2013; 347 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7470 (Published 19 December 2013)
Abhishek Trehan, Tristan J Dunn
Argues that the cost of Intuitive Surgical's system is high because its merger with Computer Motion and resulting lack of competition. Intuitive's profit margin is "remarkably high" compared to other medical device companies. Latest model of da Vinci costs $2.8 million. --Nbauman (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JAMA Surgery

Yen-Yi Juo, Omar Hyder, Adil H. Haider, Melissa Camp, Anne Lidor, Nita Ahuja. Is Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Better Than Traditional Approaches? JAMA Surgery, 2013; DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660

Answer: No.

Here's the open-access press release. Note: This is a summary of the journal article reviewed by JAMA and Johns Hopkins before it's sent out, so it's a WP:RS

With Surgical Robot, Similar Outcomes Higher Cost

Dec. 18, 2013 — In a study of national data on colon surgery, Johns Hopkins researchers found that while patients who undergo either minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery or the high-tech robotic approach have similar outcomes, robotic surgery is significantly more expensive. $,3000 more expensive. "What we have found is that the robot is no better than laparoscopy and it costs more. It has no benefit."

--Nbauman (talk) 11:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Intuitive Surgical. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929003839/http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/corporate/companyprofile/index.aspx to http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/corporate/companyprofile/index.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 29 November 2018

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Mary-Jayne Trainor from Intuitive here. Wanted to provide our updated logo for your use. My thanks again for the instruction on how to suggest updates/changes here. The logo file is not successfully being uploaded as an attachment here. Can you provide guidance on how to get that file to you? Thank you.Mjtrainor (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may use either Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard or Commons:Upload Wizard. Regards, Spintendo 19:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]