The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Jsvaidya (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)
It seems to me "inoperative tumours" must be a slip of the tongue / keyboard for "inoperable tumours", but don't feel qualified to make the change.
Awien 23:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge proposal
I am not an expert, but it looks to me as if this stub is about the same subject as TARGIT. As TARGIT is the newer article, I propose that its content be merged into this article. – ukexpat (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the author of the TARGIT page, and considered your suggestion. There are several ways to deliver radiotherapy intra-operatively; TARGIT is just one of these. It might be better if the other modalities had their own pages, all linking to this page. Norman21 (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
proposal to merge radiation therapy into this article
That's what it says in radiation therapy but they probably meant the other way around. I oppose both as merge will make it hard to maintain IORT content. - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible they meant to merge that section in RT into this article - that makes more sense as there seems too much detail on IORT in RT. - Rod57 (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
