Talk:Inclusion (cell)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
There a similar article: Inclusion body.--Radioxoma (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TheSilentAchiever.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Critique
I personally believe this page is very informative. However, the information on Cytoplasmic inclusions is somewhat bias. For instance, lipids and crystals were presented from the same reference. You can easily see how that can come off one sided because of the lack of information from another source. Maybe presenting a scientific journal or dating the findings of these inclusions can help. I also noticed the lack in images presented on the page. Sometimes the addition of images or data can make it easier for the reader to understand. It also dawned on me that there wasn't any hyperlinks to many of the scientific words. Not all readers fully understand what melanin or substantia of the brain is in animal cells. The page is without a doubt informative, but the word retractile was hyperlinked incorrectly. Drowe002 (talk) 23:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
This statement in the first line "are not bound by membranes" is not entirely correct, since vacuoles of certain types, bound by membranes, are considered cytoplasmic inclusions. Suirauqa (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)