Talk:IgA nephropathy

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nephrology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about IgA nephropathy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

How Special Is Japan Anyway?

"School children in Japan undergo routine urinalysis (as do Army recruits in Singapore) and any suspicious abnormality is pursued with a kidney biopsy, which might partly explain the high incidence of IgA nephropathy in those countries."

Is such screening really all that unusual? Belgian children also undergo urinalysis several times (that's how I was diagnosed). And that makes me think this probably happens in much of (Western) Europe. So I find that sentence very puzzling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.76.241.224 (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unreadable

Is this helpful for anyone except med students? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.184.23 (talk) 21:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could

could this be titled 'iga nephropathy'? i agree that iga nephritis is more accurate, however (i believe) the former is the term used more commonly, esp in north america/india. for the heck of it, i typed both in google, nephropathy had 219000 whereas nephritis 115000!Hswapnil 01:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JFW | T@lk 01:30, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

diagnosis

i have reworded many parts, is it readable?Hswapnil 19:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very good work! The article was already pretty technical. Where possible, those sections relevant for the general public may need more explanatory material in brackets. Apart from the O-glycosylation hypothesis, are you aware of any other pathogenetic theories?

Would you be able to convince your local pathology department to provide a biopsy slide of mesangial proliferation, or perhaps an immunofluorescence picture of mesangial IgA deposition? JFW | T@lk 06:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

redirected from Buerger's disease and the text says this:

This should not be confused with Buerger's disease, an unrelated condition.

 How embarassing.  Someone with some knowledge ( as opposed to one like myself in search of knowledge) should fix this.

Biopsy classification

PMID 17495432 - an international working group is scoring biopsy features to establish a systematic pathological classification of IgA nephropathy. JFW | T@lk 21:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience. Please read the external links policy (and perhaps the specific rules for medicine-related articles) before adding more external links.

The following kinds of links are inappropriate:

Online discussion groups or chat forums
Personal webpages and blogs
Multiple links to the same website
Fundraising events or groups
Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)

I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sialylation

doi:10.1172/JCI33189 - premature IgA1 O-sialylation seems to be a feature. JFW | T@lk 11:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enzymtherapy

I have very good experiance with the enzymotherapy. - WOBENZYM -. This product helped me to dismiss my microhematuria caused by IgA nephropathy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.180.24.79 (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IgA nephropathy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061130100617/http://www.igan.ca/ to http://www.igan.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Large amounts of unsourced edits

This edit inserted a lot of unsourced claims. I invite Dr.Jess.W2014 (talk · contribs) to discuss the edit here. What we need are reliable sources to verify the claims. Further, I would recommend making smaller edits -- perhaps limited to just one section (or even one sentence) at a time for ease of discussion. Please discuss here before making further edits. Thank you! SueDonem (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]