Talk:History of computed tomography

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Litigation

I seem to remember that there was a lot of litigation between EMI and others over who had the rights to produce CT scanners. Shouldn't that be mentioned here?

Marchino61 (talk) 03:39, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson & Johnson paid EMI £20 Million for infringing Hounsfield's patents. But only after EMI was excluded from the US by order of President Carter. 62.249.214.80 (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:History of computed tomography

Litigation

Navigation menu

Search