Talk:Hexamine fuel tablet

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles

External links

Two of the external links are broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.119.147 (talk) 09:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was moved from Esbit, and redirected as this is a more precise term. Added chemistry stub because the article needs information about the chemical makeup of the heat tablets. I have also added all of the common terms this is refered with as redirects. --Darkfred 13:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Haxamine is created by Ammonia / formaldahyde, Its a white crystal like powder in pure form Ray doucette 04:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just used a pocket torch / gas lighter to incinerate a completely wet and rain-exposed pack of ESBIT, which still kept its shape of qubes and would not liquify if exposed to rain. this stuff has its advantages.91.60.141.214 (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

in or im?

Come on, folks. Lets get some concensus here instead of this ping-pong game. Any German speakers here? --Roly (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've kept returning it to "im" because that was the first time someone gave a reason for it being one way or the other. Now looking at the history, I see it was originally written "in"[1], which then remained until a change identified as 'typo of german "in should be im"'[2]. Since then, it has been changed back to "in" various times with no reason or with no more definitive basis than that. I couldn't find it on the company's website, and Google Translate doesn't seem to disprove either way. I {{cn}}'ed it. We actually need a citeable source, since it's a claimed fact of an actual name that is "whatever the company decided to call it", not just a native speaker to tell us what is now linguistically correct. DMacks (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure but I'm leaning towards "in". I've found a few references in German web sites, including German Wikipedia, which say "in" but none that say "im". The only references I can find that say "im" are English Wikipedia and a few unreliable sources that are probably quoting Wikipedia. I have not yet found a reliable citeable source. --Roly (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hexamine fuel tablet

External links

in or im?

Navigation menu

Search