Talk:Harsh Vardhan Shringla

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

POV of article

I don't think this article is necessarily biased, but a lot of it reads like it is a press release from the Ambassador's office. I was wondering if other people felt the same way. Dhawk790 (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Are the tables of speeches encyclopedic content?

Should the article list his speeches? Worldbruce (talk) 04:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. The over 200 speeches listed are excessive detail that goes against Wikipedia's inclusion policy. Wikipedia is neither a repository of links to primary sources, nor an indiscriminate list without explanatory context. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, and I think the policy as explained in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not is clearly applicable in this case such that an RfC is probably unnecessary. I would say you or another editor have solid grounds to be bold and remove most (if not all; I am unfamiliar with the content itself) of them from the article, barring coverage of any given speech as particularly noteworthy/salient. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 13:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No - this article should not include comprehensive lists of speeches the subject has made. The speeches are one, of many, sub-topics that are relevant to the subject and as such they should be developed in sections, to summarize the key points to give a concise overview. If the sub-topic is notable, in its own right, a separate article or list may be appropriate, and there you can extend the details more fully. See Wikipedia:Summary style; paying particular attention to: §§ Article size, Levels of detail, and Non-notable topics and relocating material. Best regards.--John Cline (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No - It would be an excessive amount of information that will end up taking up most of the article. Not saying speeches weren't relevant to his career, but I fail to see how listing every single one would make the article better. PraiseVivec (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, let's let sources decide which are worth listing by only including those covered by independent sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC) (Summoned by bot)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Harsh_Vardhan_Shringla"