Talk:Hallmark

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gemology and Jewelry: Jewelry High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Jewelry subpage.

Should direct elswere

Hey i think this page should re-direct to Hallmark, the card company. I think ppl are more likely to be looking for the company thn the precius metal stamp. what do u think? Paco8191 23:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something Useful

something that would be useful to include in this article would be a table of date codes, or something similar. I found a website which lists these; but I do not know haw to make tables, so I would apreciate it if someone else could do it for me and tell me how to make tables please

thanks Stwalkerster 16:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dictionary quote

Anyone else think this looks a bit sloppy?

Merriam-Webster also defines the metaphorical use of hallmark as: "a distinguishing characteristic, trait, or feature <the dramatic flourishes which are the hallmark of the trial lawyer — Marion K. Sanders>".

For one thing, I don't think people using 'hallmark' in this sense are using markings on metal objects as a metaphor- They're just using the term in another, also well-established sense. For another, why quote Webster's dictionary (and Marion Saunders?)--Eloil 20:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

replaced websters link w/ wiktionary. --Eloil 21:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responsibility marks

Responsibility marks are mentioned but not well-explained nor illustrated. -- Beland 15:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantium

Older than France here in the history section? Ie Byzantine system oldest in Europe.Eugene-elgato (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Setting up WikiProject Silverware?

Would anyone be interested in helping to set up a WikiProject Silverware? I'm interested in salvers, coffee pots, jugs, candlesticks, famous silversmiths, different styles, etc. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 11:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hallmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070409074854/http://www.ezv.admin.ch/ezv/00433/index.html?lang=fr to http://www.ezv.admin.ch/ezv/00433/index.html?lang=fr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On "lots" as a fineness measure for silver

There is a "clarification needed" marker on the phrase "12 to 13 lots (75% to 81%) for silver."

An explanation is provided on page 493 of "Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide" (Frank Anthony Carl Mantello, A. G. Rigg, editors): "... in Germany pure silver was said to be 16 lots (lotions) fine." Under that system, silver of "12 lots fineness" would be 75% elemental silver and 25% other metals.

I wonder if this information should be added to the entry on Fineness?

Mcavalletto (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Hallmarks / Switzerland / Swiss Watch Hallmarks

The information in this image

Watch cases hallmarks

conflicts with that found at swisshallmarks.com (which links to the authoritative version at the Swiss Federal department of Precious Metal Control: https://www.ezv.admin.ch/ezv/en/home/topics/precious-metal-control/official-controlling-and-hallmarking.html).

That image shows:

Unless there is objection, I will remove the undocumented sourceless version of this image and replace it with the official document.

The version of the image that currently appears looks to me to be "correct," but I cannot find a source for it and it is listed as "own work." The version at swisshallmarks matches exactly that which is found in the pdf from Precious Metal Control.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hallmark Cards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

X-Ray Fluorescence instrument for Gold Testing.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]