Talk:Gas to liquids

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

should be pluralized

It's normally used as the plural "gas-to-liquids", because it produces different liquids at the same time. Does anybody object? ObsidianOrder 04:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oryx GTL in Qatar is the World First GTL Plant....

Alternate pathways?

This article seems to imply that the only MTG reaction is that using the zeolite catalyst. While that's surely the most popular (and possibly the only one used industrially), there are others. For instance, Donald Pearson first showed that it could be done with polyphosphoric acid, and at lower temperatures. (In the interest of disclosure, I'm only interested in this subject because I work with such a mechanism. I most likely wouldn't even know about it otherwise... Should that indicate that the material isn't noteworthy?) --Maebnus 04:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should that indicate that the material isn't noteworthy?

I think no. seems it is just that too few are interested in the process ( maybe due to being uneconomical for most circumstances ). Also I suggest to search for DME to gasoline ( and maybe write an article on this) --83.167.104.182 21:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A380 vs Tu-155

What´s the difference between those two aircrafts, I know that Tu-155 run alternate fuel on one of three engines, what about the A380? RGDS Alexmcfire —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmcfire (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biomass Feedstock

It's faster to convert biomass to methanol via low-oxygen combustion, than it is to use fermentation to convert sugars to ethanol. Low-oxygen combustion also works with cellulose and lignin whereas efficient fermentation has not yet been invented. So this gas-to-liquids approach looks like the right solution, producing drop-in usable liquid fuels from both natural gas and biomass. What disadvantages does it have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.110.93 (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gas to liquids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nature?

From the introduction: "Direct partial combustion has been demonstrated in nature but not replicated commercially. Technologies reliant on partial combustion have been commercialized mainly in regions where natural gas is inexpensive." Sounds like a contradiction to me. And just what does the term 'nature' mean here? 50.39.173.185 (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Gas_to_liquids"