Talk:Gamete intrafallopian transfer

Bioethical issues: the Catholic Church's position

I modified this paragraph, because the Church has never taken an official position on GIFT. Some moral theologians have objected to the practice, as the article correctly mentions, but other moral theologians have said that it is OK. Both camps include theolgians committed to doctrinal orthodoxy, and so the issue is still considered open.

See, for example, http://www2.loras.edu/~CatholicHE/Arch/Sexuality/Gamete.html and http://books.google.ch/books?id=If9MQQoHg7IC&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=moral+theologians+Gamete+intrafallopian+transfer+in+favor&source=bl&ots=ikueHEwbxW&sig=6Q54aioU5soDBqL_TmOWtBA25LY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wwtkUNb1KabU4QT334GABg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=moral%20theologians%20Gamete%20intrafallopian%20transfer%20in%20favor&f=false. (The latter source, in my opinion, is in error in saying that Catholic theologians faithful to the Magisterium would be in favor of artificial insemination, which is a very different act, unless what they mean is gamete intrauterine transfer, which, morally speaking, is similar to GIFT.)

AthanasiusOfAlex (talk) 08:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gamete intrafallopian transfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211135839/http://www.videojug.com:80/interview/assisted-reproductive-technology-2 to http://www.videojug.com/interview/assisted-reproductive-technology-2#what-is-a-gamete-intra-fallopian-transfer-or-gift

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)