Talk:Fluid replacement

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Modern traumacare

Important note: It is NOT modern traumacare to aggressively replace blood loss with massive amounts of fluid! Will rewrite this but don't have time right now, sorry.--Johan M 19:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I just proposed a merge of Management of dehydration to this article, Fluid replacement. Most of the content on this topic is at oral rehydration therapy, which is the standard response to dehydration. Some information on this topic is at intravenous therapy, but that article also discusses using drugs as treatment and not just fluid for rehydration. I think that this article, "fluid replacement", should be the hub for giving an overview of all hydration treatments. Thoughts? Can I merge the management article here? Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge Before clicking on Management of dehydration, I thought of it as a survival practice akin to Bear Grylls, drinking his own urine. But it looks like a huge overlap with fluid replacement per WP:MERGEREASON, even though the term "fluid replacement" doesn't seem to be entirely correct - it's possible to just drink more water, without replacing one fluid with another. Brandmeistertalk 12:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Replacement can just mean "putting it back", to restore something that's broken or lost. Menopausal hormone "replacement" therapy is usually about putting the estrogen back through a different route, not about going full anabolic androgens. Artoria2e5 🌉 10:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: I've looked carefully at trying to do this, but am now convinced that dehydration itself is sufficiently important (independently notable) that it deserves and benefits from discussion independently of fluid replacement. Fluid replacement is used for many other problems (for example, maintenance of fluid intake when people can't drink), while managing dehydration includes other interventions that aren't about replacing fluid. The pages are adequately linked for people wanting to read more, so a merge seems unnecessary. Klbrain (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fluid replacement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restarting a merge request from User:Blue Rasberry. The current MOD article is arranged badly and focuses too much on diarrhea. The FR article is a way better overview on MOD than the MOD article itself.

The information should go into two sections: "By mouth" and a new subsection "Diarrhea" under "Clinical uses". Artoria2e5 🌉 10:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]