Talk:Final Fantasy Tactics Advance/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. And from the way it looks, it fails GA citeria. Problem are:

• Un-referenced material.
• An un-cited reference.
• And, in my opinion, this and this seem unnesessary.

So if the article doesn't get fixed in 7 days, it will be delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

• Images removed, I agree with you that they're not being discussed in text but are instead just decoration. I'll see what I can do about the references/cites. --PresN 15:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
• Uncited reference fixed. It was strange, someone just added a line break and a url to the end of another reference. --PresN 16:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
• And now, references everywhere. Anything else to fix? --PresN 03:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes. Where's the reviews for Edge and EGM? GamerPro64 (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Whoops, added. --PresN 20:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

O.k. I'm gonna keep its GA-status. Great job PresN! GamerPro64 (talk) 02:50, 10 October 2009 (UTC)