Talk:Filoviridae

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Older posts

Could somebody with some philological background elaborate on the filo- stem of the word? Thanks.Theharpguy 01:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Hope this helps. --Eschbaumer (talk) 09:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The last paragraph (as of 23rd August 2007) uses far too much technical jargon - to the point where even someone (such as myself) with a fair degree of background knowledge in the subject has difficulty understanding it. Can somebody who knows the terminolgy please clarify it to, say, New Scientist levels? Napalm Llama 11:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Media

Considering both the prevalence of Ebola (and Ebola-like viruses) in various media, most recently with the "Rosalia" pathogen (specifically identified as a Filoviridae virus) in the Atlus game Trauma Team, does anyone else think a "Filoviridae in media" section is warranted, as exists for several other topics such as railguns? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.99.200.77 (talk) 01:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this should be done only if there significant coverage of its appearance in media... that is the appearance should only be noted if it in and of itself is is sourced. These sections are spam magnets.Unfriend13 (talk) 17:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence.

i'm confused by the first sentence. (the part i bolded)

The family and CDC Filoviridae (members are called Filovirus) is the taxonomic home of several related viruses that form filamentous infectious viral particles (virions), and encode their genome in the form of single-stranded negative-sense RNA.

it was added after this revision and i'm not sure if CDC is an acronym for something (other than Center for Disease Control) and it's just ambiguous to us laypeople without expansion, or if it's a cut-paste error of an unrelated reference to the Center. ≈Sensorsweep (talk) 06:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Vaccine and concerns

I've just amended the last section, which was horrible; full of alarmism and poorly researched. Having said that, I only made it slightly better. The goal wasn't to write a new section, just minimized BS. I'm a biologist, and I'm pretty comfortable with a few subjects, but this is very much outside my knowledge base. Can we get a virologist over here, please?

Eminent Junkie (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

section on Reston Monkey Outbreak

So that entire section reads like someone was pushing out a paper for a class, and doesn't really do much to help understand the nature of filoviridae. Given that the information within is currently included in the page 'Reston Virus', and in better detail and quality, I am deleting it from here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.42 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filoviridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Filoviridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History and Discovery

Right now the article has this: "The family Filoviridae is a virological taxon that was defined in 1982[3]" and a link to a paper. While this is ok, I think it would be better to re-structure this and explain what exactly happened in 1982. After all this led to the classification of the virus family, yes? So it would be nice if the article could have a short "history" subsection or at the least an extension to the sentence about the discovery. Some viruses were discovered in, almost, 1889, so when another virus is only discovered ~100 years lateron, people may be interested in the question "why so late?". 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 12:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Filoviridae"