Talk:Expanded access

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Propose merger. Articles are mostly redundant and could easily be merged. The expanded access article is longer with more references and more than just a definition at this time, and 'expanded access' is more encompassing and neutral than 'compassionate use', so it would be easier to merge in the indicated direction. JetheroTalk 01:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Recind proposal. No debate/dissent ensued in 3 months. JetheroTalk 23:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Instead, note that the compassionate use article was essentially a copy of a definition from commerical site mederms.com, and then a personal point of veiw interpretation of what that means. I will replace the article with a vocabulary notice and reference to wiktionary, where definitions belong, (though there is not yet a wiktionary definition.) JetheroTalk 23:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think that your original merge proposal was the right move. Compassionate use should be an automatic redirect to this article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Managed use program here

As with the former Compassionate use article, Managed use program has several issues, and is a fork of this content, so I propose a simple redirect. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 02:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]