Talk:ErbB
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KP 0503. Peer reviewers: Dimah Almahbub, JWamsley, SSASHWIN, Lbates2008.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment
This sentence seems obscure to me: "ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 are found in many human cancers, and their excessive signaling may be critical factors in the development and malignancy of these tumors.", since all of the ErbB-1 to ErbB-4 are found in human. Probably people just meant "Over expressed ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 are..."? Chúc Thành (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Schwann Cell Development
ErbB2/3 and Nrg1 typeIII play a pivotal role in migration, maintenance, and proliferation during Schwann cell development. [1] I think that this would be interesting and a good addition to the article. Is anyone opposed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakkinen2013 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. FYI, Wikipedia has over 4 million articles and only over 3 thousand "very active" editors, so it can be hard to get talk page feedback sometimes, unfortunately. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ Nave KA,Salzer JL. 2006. Axonal regulation of myelination by neuregulin 1. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 492–500.
Editing and Adding content in Stucture and Kinase activation part
I will be adding some detailed information and content regarding structure and activation part with citation as part of my wikiproject. KP 0503 (talk) 08:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)KP0503
In the structure section, you cannot use words like approx, use it fully "approximately". In the kinase activation, check some places for inappropriate capitalization. Other than that, everything is fine in your partSSASHWIN (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)