Talk:Electrical energy

Comments

electric energy is something that is static like rubbing your hair and putting it on a balloon or when you putt a hat on winter your hair kinda goes up when you take it off00:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)99.125.148.156 (talk)

This needs some more detail. Maybe a history of our knowledge of electricity (Micheal Farady, Einstien etc). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.150.85.134 (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Matej Krnic is a name planted on this place! He has no relation with electricity! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14D:5CE1:B669:81E8:88CD:E321:51CD (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 04 June 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

---

Electric energy → Electrical energy – The article begins with "Electrical energy is the energy newly derived ...", so the lemma should be named "electrical energy"; So far there is redirect from "electrical energy" to "electric energy", as the article uses electrical energy, the redirect should be the other way around. – Gunnar (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

@Gunnar.Kaestle:This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• NOTE there is edit history at the requested title that was merged into other targets. It will need to be preserved. Suggest moving the edit history at Electrical energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to energy (electrical) to clear the way for the request, when this request is approved. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  • See also move request at Talk:electrical energytalk:energy (electrical) which attempts to clear the location's edit history. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed redirect

I've gotten gun shy about redirects so I'll throw it up at the barn door here and see if it sticks. As far as the "physics lecture" sense of electric energy is needed, it's already at electricity; and this article doesn't go into "test charges doing work against an electric field" at all. As far as we need to talk about electric energy for lights and plugs, we've got the Electric power article. This article seems entirely superfluous. Let's redirect it, to, oh, say Electricity in the interests of maintainability. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I agree. This article is unnecessary and confusing. Elektrolyt (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)