Talk:Douglas Cloudster II

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Douglas Cloudster II article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

A fact from Douglas Cloudster II appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Douglas Aircraft Corporation's Cloudster II, intended for use as an executive transport, was powered by two engines but only had a single propeller?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/November.

Wikipedia

Should'nt the Douglas Cloudster not be in see also, but on the top as not to be confused with?

The Douglas Cloudster could be confused with the Douglas Cloudster II, and both are unrelated, so shouldnt it be at the top as, "not to be confused with"? A-37Dragonfly (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it should be where it is, i was wrong A-37Dragonfly (talk) 04:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Douglas Cloudster II

Should'nt the Douglas Cloudster not be in see also, but on the top as not to be confused with?

Navigation menu

Search