Talk:Dosulepin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dosulepin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Dosulepin.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Dosulepin vs. dothiepin

Anybody know why dothiepin was renamed to dosulepin? I'm of the impression that dothiepin was the prevalent name, and changing it seems to have caused some amount of confusion. Chris 22:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its original name was and is dosulepin, it was developed under this trivial name in the former Czechoslovakia back in the 1960's as a derivative of amitriptyline.--Spiperon 22:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiotoxicity

I've heard claims that dothiepin is particularly cardiotoxic at doses not massively higher than what might be prescribed for theraputic use. Anybody know if this is true, and if so, is it worth mentioning in the article? Chris 22:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, every anticholinergic TCA is cardiotoxic above the maximal daily dose. As dosulepin is quite anticholinergic (not as much as amitriptyline, but more than desipramine), it is cardiotoxic in higher doses. But not particulary. Amitriptyline, in this respect, is somewhat worse.--Spiperon 22:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Formulae

The formulae does't show the hydrochloride. --Jü (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pure cis, pure trans or cis,trans-mixture?

Who knows the answer? --Jü (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mild

"Dosulepin is relatively mild and is used for low-level anxiety, depression and similar disorders"

acording to the data sheetit is as effective as amitriptyline in antireserpine activity, so I'm not sure what exactly it is mild in comparison to?

I'm going to zap this line, as it is unreferenced and I believe, incorrect.

121.209.52.159 (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Jonathan[reply]

This line has not been deleted... could someone please verify? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.202.220 (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Structure (image) looks incorrect

... seems to be showing trans-dosulepin, while the CAS apparently does not specify the isomer. Cf the German page for dosulepin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.246.174.181 (talk) 03:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dosulepin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131108013656/http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/pdsp.php to http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/pdsp.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CAS number

A racemate don't exist with dosulepin - a cis/trans-mixture is NO racemate!--FK1954 (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]