Talk:Diving instructor

B-class review

B

The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. Looks OK. Y The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Several empty sections, so some work needed here. N The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Looks OK. Y The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Looks OK. Y The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Room for improvement, but OK. Y The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Looks OK. Y

OK in most ways, but several empty sections imply coverage insufficient. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose merging Master Instructor into Diving Instructor as it is a variety of diving instructor qualification which may not pass general notability, and is currently rated start class, but contains very little encyclopaedic information. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Discuss:

No objections so far, but I will leave this a bit longer as the merge tags were on the talk pages and may not have been noticed. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Still no objections, so will do the merge. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 12:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diving instructor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161104080007/http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_reg/ohasa85o1993rangnr41716/ to http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_reg/ohasa85o1993rangnr41716/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)