Talk:Direct methanol fuel cell

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was uncontroversial, thus moved. Patstuart^talk|edits 19:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Direct-methanol fuel cell → Direct methanol fuel cell – The hyphenated version does not appear to be used in any significant frequency outside of Wikipedia and its clones, such as answers.com, if Google is any indication. I searched the Web and newspapers, but I did not find any instances of the hyphenated version, except for pages related to Wikipedia, despite checking several pages of results. I do not remember ever seeing the hyphenated version in any books or magazines, either. -- Kjkolb 04:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Survey - Support votes

Survey - Oppose votes

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

external link question

Grantalkin (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC) I'd like to include an external link to the site of the exclusive worldwide licensor of patented Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Technology the link is [removed][reply]

Sorry for striking out your link, but those must be crooks. I work in DMFC research and I never heard of these patent trolls, so there is no reason to give them free advertisement. 193.175.53.21 (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction - Clarification needed on OH "group"

"Reaction" segment says talks about OH radical, then quote "Using these OH groups" lists reactions with OH- ions. whether the reaction is written with H+ or OH- makes sense depending on the pH of the solution. but what that's got to do with the formation of OH radicals? some clarification would be nice from an expert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.21.48.174 (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add Section on Methanol Fuel Cell Catalysts

I thought it would be appropriate to include a section on the catalysts used in methanol fuel cells. They're essential part of the cells function, but there isn't that much information about them on the current page. Any thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hispinstate (talk • contribs) 01:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No real efficiency or power output numbers

Arguably the most important aspects of a fuel cell are its energy density, its efficiency, and its power capability per unit mass or volume. If someone knows of a reliable source for this information, please do add it. The only thing I saw here was that "methanol has 15 times the energy density of li-ion batteries" - which suggests DMFCs have huge potential, but without their efficiency or power output per kg, that statement tells us little. Dan Pope (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Direct methanol fuel cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The cell

how can you say "in contrast to indirect methanol fuel cells" when your stated direct reaction is literally methanol + water = steam reforming into hydrogen. direct would be single step methanol + o2 or maybe oh-, and renaming the current indirect methanol fuel cell to double indirect methanol fuel cell, because of external steam reforming, and not internal steam reforming (h2o step in both). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goofyseeker311 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]