Talk:Derek Rae

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can not beleive that there was a vote to delete the article about Derek Rae, he is the main voice of ESPN's european soccer coverage, he host Press Pass twice a week, and also one of the main callers of the La Liga, Fa Cup and Champions league

Phony Accent

Why is there no mention of Rae using a pathetically fake American accent during 1998 World Cup matches? This guy is a fraud, a nobody, and a first-rate dork. He also lies about his age; if he was born in 1967, then I am a toddler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.113.100 (talk) 15:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Birth Year

The given source that Rae was born in 1967 is clearly incorrect. Check out the following link - does this man look 42 to you? http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/content/Image/06-25-2008/Derek-Rae.jpg Rae is obviously at least 50.

Until a verifiable source is provided, no birth year should be listed.

Manutdglory (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is the Boston Globe not a reliable source? See seventh paragraph referring to the "38-year-old Scot" in 2005: [1] See second paragraph referring to him being 29 years old in 1996: [2] Your opinion is irrelevant versus two matching published articles giving his age in a reliable source nine years apart. Mike Doughney (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't notice the second source - hmmm. I've seen the guy on TV and if he's really only 42, he's the oldest-looking guy under-50 I've ever seen in my life - seriously. I honestly could have sworn he was 60. Check this out: here's a photo of Rae's 75-year old co-commentator, Tommy Smyth. http://www.irishconnectionsmag.com/archives/v2i4/smith.jpg Does anyone really believe that Smyth is 33 years older than Rae?Manutdglory. Manutdglory (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Several bits of this article are taken word for word from the Boston Globe article used as one of the sources. They need to be re-written, as they currently constitute plagiarism. Tad Lincoln (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]