Talk:Contraception in the Republic of Ireland

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

question on wikiproject.

Why would this page be under a wiki project for abortion? It is about contraception, the artifical prevention of a pregnacy, not the termination of a pregancy. Putting it under such a project seems illogical and misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.64.251 (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

valid point
Removed. Scolaire (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the introductory paragraph is incorrect. The changing law did not reflect a change in Catholic morality on sexuality. The Churches stance on contraception has remained unchanged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.255.166 (talk) 07:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

opposition

Is it reasonable to say "Despite the law reforms, some Irish people still publicly oppose the use of contraception within marriage, including sports personality Mickey Harte" without some indication of how numerous this opposition is? Furthermore, Harte resides "outside the jurisdiction". - ClemMcGann (talk) 11:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He does, but would probably describe himself as an "Irish person", so I worded it that way.Red Hurley (talk) 10:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is "a few" better? I've linked to Brandsma and Dr McCrystal's essay. He also lives in NI but his Irish charity has an address in Dublin 1.Red Hurley (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ok, forgot about the american-funded HLI, although I still reckon it givs them undue prominence - ClemMcGann (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's a minority view now, but wikipedia should cite differing opinions IMHO.Red Hurley (talk) 07:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Contraception in the Republic of Ireland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]