Talk:Computed tomography angiography
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Computed tomography angiography.
|
Untitled
will any one contribute more to make the article useful and informative? Abushahin 11:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I've just added a picture to demonstrate CTA and added a couple of internal links. The article is pretty good though. Heather 10:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Glitzy_queen00
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 1 February 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bpbassett1. Peer reviewers: Rvle222.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
μCT angiography
What does the μ in μCT angiography mean? Saw it in several papers.
173.206.212.66 (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Med Student
Hey everyone! I am a 4th year medical student at UCF and will be working on updating this article over the next few weeks to add more information and citations. I plan to work on the following areas: - checking existing citations - adding citations for current information - improving Medical Uses and Risks sections - Adding new section for contraindications - Attempt to add some more photographs Thanks in advance for your help and feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpbassett1 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Peer review: Pretty great expansion of the article. I think it definitely provides a lot more context for any reader to follow what a CTA is. You did thoroughly expanded a lot of the content to describe the medical uses and what sort of pathologies that you would be looking for in different parts of the body. It overall strikes a very good balance between being thorough with content while being readable for the average layperson. There's a bit of jargon-y writing in the Coronary section, but I think that was written before you came in? The pictures you added I think are pretty good examples of CTAs as well. I think the other thing that really stood out to me is maybe a short run-down of what sort of diagnostic criteria would warrant people to use CTA even with renal issues? I'll otherwise throw in a few edits here and there for commas and grammar that I don't think are worth listing out on a talk page. Rvle222 (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)