Talk:Civic Coalition (Poland)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The abreviation KObywatelska sound like "mare on phone" 'Kobyła tel ska' in english. Can you add proper pronountiation ? 99.90.196.227 (talk) 11:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Coalición Cívica" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Coalición Cívica. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8#Coalición Cívica until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Eyesnore 21:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similarities to the Democratic party of Korea

The coalition has been compared to the Democratic Party of Korea. 2A02:3030:815:366A:1:0:664A:231A (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lock this page

it was vandalized by a PiS troll 2A02:8108:1640:5282:588B:34C3:D6D:B6A1 (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LPR now in KO

https://www.rp.pl/polityka/art39013811-grzegorz-schetyna-roman-giertych-bedzie-swiatlem-ktore-pokaze-slabosc-jaroslawa-kaczynskiego 2A02:3030:808:22FE:1:0:133F:89E2 (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024

Remove "Anti-immigration" from info card It's over-interpretation to call the party like that. Leader of Civic Platform talks about problems on Polish border, he's not against all immigrants. 52pppppp52 (talk) 10:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: As shown in the list of references for the Anti-immigration statement (reference number 4 at the time of writing), multiple reliable sources have explicitly described the party as being anti-immigration. Liu1126 (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Hi, I think the name of the article should be "Civic Coalition" and not "Civic Coalition (Poland)". The distinction is done to differentiate from Civic Coalition (Argentina), a minor defunct coalition, that had only 5 out of 257 seats in the parlament, and which existed only for 4 years. In comparison, Ciciv Coalition is well established party coaltion in Poland, which primarily consists of one of arguably two most important parties in Poland (Civic Platform) and is part of the current parliamentary coalition government. Also, I will add that I cannot quite remember if it was always named like that, or renamed recently, but if the latter, then it is quite similar situation to article about the Law and Justice, which was alos briefly moved to "Law and Justice (Poland)", before being reverted back soof after. Thank you for reading my message, and please share your thoughts on the matter if you would like too. Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agree with this, KO is clearly more important than the one in Argentina, and given that they are the most important member in the Tusk Government, their publicity will have risen Auspol4 (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]