Talk:Cherry pit spitting
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | A fact from Cherry pit spitting appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that there is a Guinness world record for the amateur sport of cherry pit spitting of 93 feet and 6.5 inches?
- ALT1:... that the act of cherry pit spitting as far as you can is considered a sport, and there's a Guinness world record of 93 feet and 6.5 inches?
5x expanded by Bluetyphoon27 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC).
- Length and time acceptable, neutrally written. This was an entertaining and informative read. Hook is neutral and cited within article.
No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but there's one paragraph that has no cites, per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bluetyphoon27: thank you for adding the cite, but it is not correctly formatted. Please include the article title, writer, and page number as you did for your other cites. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 09:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: The nominator hasn't edited since June 17th. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reminder, Narutolovehinata5. I went ahead and completed the formatting. Restoring tick per No Swan So Fine's review. Yoninah (talk) 08:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: The nominator hasn't edited since June 17th. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Length and time acceptable, neutrally written. This was an entertaining and informative read. Hook is neutral and cited within article.
