Talk:Capernwray Dive Centre

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Multiple issues

Rationale: The article is not intended as an advertisement. It was modelled on the article of another leading UK inland diving centre Stoney Cove. Guidance on what comes over as non-neutral would be welcomed. Will add some more details, but the centre's web site seems to be currently crashed.Nickpheas (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:
It does not currently look like advertising to me. It looks like a fairly objective but very basic description of a popular diving and training site.
It is not obviously less notable than several other dive site articles. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capernwray Dive Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]