Talk:Cancer insurance

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): StuckInThought. Peer reviewers: Celsisa.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This article has almost no citations, and feels like a long advertisement for cancer insurance.

Planned improvements

History of insurance coverage for cancer treatments, especially before "cancer insurance" was a thing
Any debate surrounding regulations on cancer insurance, especially with regard to the passage of healthcare legislation
Coverage, availability, and equity
Cancer coverage outside of the US
Less bias and expansion of the "concerns" section
Adding citations, because there are no citations right now! (and linking to other pages)

Sources to look at

American Cancer Society's website (cancer.org) Dr. Otis Brawley's How We Do Harm

StuckInThought (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I think it would be helpful to explicitly define terms such as "lump-sum" for people that may not necessarily know what it is or link that Wikipedia article to it the first time it is mentioned. I think the division of the sections was especially well done and that the information was appropriate and unbiased and that the citations were correctly used.Celsisa (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]