Talk:Calcium in biology

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Protists in quotation marks

Why is protists in quotation marks? It is a perfectly valid scientific term. Have removed them. 82.153.195.203 08:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calcium and the heart

Isn't calcium necissary for the heart to beat? --Susan Walton 23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calcium content of beans

Can the calcium content of the common bean be added? Badagnani (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calcium in biology---2 Non-humans

 There are some problems of the first paragraph.

Something like[[===formula here</math></math>phosphate]] [[Media:Insert non-formatted]]'' ''text hereInsert non-formatted text here ===Other eukaryotes==Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here]]'' appear in the text and I think there is no relationship with the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deluxenville (talkcontribs) 11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sesame seeds - good that they get mentioned

Good to see that the section on food sources of calcium refers to sesame seeds. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calcium in biology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Humans/Dietary recommendations

Created section Humans to include Dietary recommendations, Food sources and Measurement in blood. David notMD (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

In Dietary recommendations: "May 27, 2016 it was revised to 1300 mg to bring it into agreement with the RDA." In the table it says: "19-50 years 1000" Should the table not say 19-50 years 1300mg? Mermaidthrone (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For setting Daily Value, the highest RDA not counting pregnancy or lactation. Hence, the table is correct that the RDA for 19-50 is 1000 mg/d but the DV is 1300 mg/d because that is the RDA for teenagers. Another example, the iron RDA for men is 8 mg but because the RDA for women who are pre-menopause is 18 mg. the DV is 18 mg. David notMD (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added health claims content

Added more detail on what approved and what not. David notMD (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]